Queen’s chimney sweep reveals how ‘incredibly knowledgeable’ monarch always spoke to people who worked for her about their jobs and made them feel ‘very important’

By Chris Matthews For Mailonline

Published: 08:05 GMT, 19 September 2022 | updated: 10:00 GMT, 19 September 2022

The Queen’s chimney sweeps have revealed how the monarch would make them feel ‘important’ when they worked in her homes including Buckingham Palace.

Kevin Giddings, 61, and his team from Milborrow Chimney Sweeps have looked after the chimneys and fires at royal homes including Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, St James’ Palace and Kensington Palace since 2002.

Speaking to The Argus, his wife Katie recalled how the ‘knowledgeable’ late monarch spoke to her husband about his work and made everyone around her ‘feel important’.

Kevin Giddings (pictured) has looked after chimneys at royal homes including Buckingham Palace for more than 20 years

Mr Giddings was given a royal warrant in 2002 by Her Majesty The Queen, who passed away peacefully at Balmoral Castle in Scotland aged 96, on September 8

The chimney sweep was presented to the Queen six times and also met the then-Prince Charles and the late Duke of Edinburgh.

He also bumped into Her Majesty when he was cleaning her palaces and his wife Katie revealed the Queen made him feel important through a series of small gestures.

‘On one occasion there was a function, we were at Buckingham Palace and the Queen indicated to my husband and said, “It’s my chimney sweep”,’ she told The Argus.

‘She was an incredibly knowledgeable lady who even spoke to the chimney sweep about his work and made him feel very important.’

The Giddings family thinks King Charles III will be an excellent monarch and wished him all the best. Pictured: Charles III in the 1844 Room at Buckingham Palace today

She added that her husband was ‘honoured and thrilled’ that the late monarch recognized him.

Buckingham Palace has around 300 chimneys and although they are not all used, cleaning is needed to ensure proper ventilation.

Hampton Court Palace’s kitchen chimney is one of the toughest to sweep because of its sheer size, which means sweeps have to climb up the inside the shaft.

The chimney at the former residence of Henry VIII is often exceptionally sooty, and is 48 feet high and more than 20 across.

In 2002, the business was given a royal warrant by the Queen. Whether or not Mr Giddings and his team retain the warrant will be up to King Charles III.

Katie added the family thinks King Charles III will be an excellent monarch and wished him all the best for his reign.

Share or comment on this article:

The post Queen’s chimney sweeps reveal how monarch all the time made them really feel ‘crucial’  appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.

When will Trey Lance finally become the quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers?

This question has been popular since the 49ers drafted him to third overall in the 2021 NFL draft. Jimmy Garoppolo and Lance fought at training camp before the incumbent was named a starter.

Then Garoppolo went down with a calf injury and Lance was thrown into the starting XI only to go down with a knee injury. Garoppolo has been the starter ever since, and fans are wondering if Lance will ever see the field again in the 2021 season.

Well, it looks like the 49ers have a plan, even if it’s not exactly encouraging to Lance.

The 49ers have revealed Trey Lance’s blueprint but are waiting to get it out

Everyone has been wondering when – or if – Lance will be back on the field this season. Last weekend, the NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport answered those questions and revealed the 49ers’ future plans for the two quarterbacks.

“Without a Super Bowl run, which is theoretically still possible at this point in time, this is the 49ers’ plan for the next season: start Trey Lance, trade Jimmy Garoppolo. No surprise, they were pretty open about that. What Garoppolo is doing now is add to the value of the picks the 49ers get on a trade he’s in and they make it more likely that a place he wants to go will want to take him away. “

Ian Rapoport on the 49ers’ plans with Lance and Garoppolo

So there it is, the answer everyone has been waiting for.

With the 49ers still alive in the playoff picture, it looks like Garoppolo will remain the starter. San Francisco has scored three straight wins to sneak into the wild card race, and Garoppolo hasn’t played badly either.

The veteran has 2,342 yards with 13 touchdowns and six interceptions a year. It’s not great, but it’s been good enough to lead the 49ers to victory in the past few weeks.

Lance has only played five games and hasn’t been there since October 10, which was a bit of a surprise given his ability to lead football. Still, it’s Jimmy Time in San Francisco for now.

On the surface, the 49ers are doing everything they can to increase the commercial value of Garoppolo in the off-season. The quarterback market will be fluid as stars like Aaron Rodgers, Russell Wilson and possibly Deshaun Watson are available.

Garoppolo would undoubtedly be a lot cheaper than this one, and he can still offer a capable quarterback game. But the 49ers are worried here.

What if Garoppolo leads them to a deep playoff run? As Rapoport mentioned, the plan is to swap Garoppolo apart from one Super Bowl run.

Yes, a run to the Super Bowl is highly unlikely, but crazier things have happened in the NFL – especially this season. You never know, although Deebo Samuel’s injury makes things difficult.

Now turn the script over. What if nobody wants to pay to take over Garoppolo this off-season? That’s a very different scenario and a real possibility.

There are just so many factors and as long as the 49ers win with Garoppolo at the center, things will get more uncertain for Lance’s future.

Pulling Kyle Shanahan away from Trey Lance completely is another problem

Trey Lance and Jimmy Garoppolo | Brian Rothmüller / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

As long as the 49ers are winning football games, it makes sense to keep Garoppolo inside. On the other hand, leaving Lance completely is a concern.

Before the 49ers matchup against the Seattle Seahawks, Shanahan explained why he deviated from the Lance packages (h / t Jennifer Lee Chan of NBC Sports).

“I’m more concerned with telling you the truth. In terms of calling games, we get into a rhythm where we attack a defense and what fronts they play and what covers they play. Every move leads to the next move and you get a feeling for what our players are doing and I for what we are going to do. “

Kyle Shanahan on deviating from Trey Lance packages

Well that’s an interesting tidbit from Shanahan who was full of it when he was talking about Lance.

So it’s not Lance’s fault, but the head coach? That doesn’t sound good to Shanahan in terms of customization.

Ultimately, that doesn’t look at all promising for Lance for the remainder of 2021, or as long as the 49ers continue to stack wins.

It looks like a frustrating season for Lance fans, but a 49ers playoff offer would ease the pain a bit.

The ongoing situation between Garoppolo and Lance needs to be monitored while Jimmy remains in the roster.

Statistics courtesy of Pro Football Reference

RELATED: 49ers HC Kyle Shanahan Sends a Mixed Message to Trey Lance While Dismissing Regression Reports: “I’m As Eager For It As Everyone”

The post 49ers Reveal Regarding Trey Lance Blueprint as Jimmy Garoppolo Continues to Push San Francisco Right into a Playoff Berth appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.

By Philip Ruth –

Hybrids just keep getting better, and they’re no longer just the goofy-looking hatchbacks they once were. The latest Camry Hybrid was a revelation of quick acceleration and enthusiastic handling, and the two competing sedans we’re examining this week – the hybrid versions of the Honda Accord and Hyundai Sonata – are impressive in their own way.

These Honda and Hyundai hybrids are the top of their line, and they’re priced within a mosquito apart. On the base models, the Sonata Hybrid (uniquely named Blue) is $ 1,180 higher than the Accord Hybrid, while Honda’s top touring trim is $ 1,140 more expensive than the Hyundai’s limited appearance.

Obviously, when planning these models, these companies kept a close eye on each other, not just price. The total EPA mileage is roughly the same, with the Honda’s 48 mpg beating the Hyundai by one. A bigger difference is the additional 20 horsepower that Honda gets from its 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, even though they have the same number of liters.

Styling probably shows the biggest difference between them. The Honda’s fastback silhouette appeared to be eye-catching on its 2018 debut, and it still looks dramatic. The Hyundai’s design is more recent and a clear break with the sonatas of the past. Its sharp-edged contours are like no other brand and give an idea of ​​the exciting Ioniq 5, the electric SUV coming this fall.

They also differ in their driving behavior. Honda uses a continuously variable transmission (CVT), and it’s a decent version of that technology that, for some brands, can create a balloon effect when accelerating, where the engine appears to be spinning faster than the car is moving. The hills of San Francisco enhance that feeling, which is usually accompanied by an uncultivated roar from under the hood. but not so much with the powertrain of this Accord Hybrid. For the most part, it felt almost as crisp as a gearbox.

The Hyundai’s thrust delivery was more satisfactory because it actually works with gears, six of them in total, rather than a large flexible belt. It goes a long way in making the Sonata Hybrid feel like a traditional gasoline car, and it minimizes the electrical on and off delay that is part of the hybrid experience.

Both drive well, with a little more sportiness that color the behavior of the Honda. The Accord Hybrid’s steering is a bit sharper and the handling of bumps and curves is a bit more sophisticated. The Sonata Hybrid lacks that little extra handling flair, but it’s still easy to turn, especially given its medium-sized dimensions.

Inside, Honda and Hyundai are very accommodating, like large versions of themselves. The front doors open wide and the Hyundai felt lighter and airier than Honda, probably in part because of the light gray trim of the former as opposed to the all-black setup of the latter , the only offer of touring.

These two efficient mid-range models should be on every hybrid buyer’s list. It’s a tossup because everyone has their own focus on technology and design.

Philip Ruth is a Castro-based automotive photojournalist and consultant with an automotive staging service.

Published on August 12, 2021

The post Honda and Hyundai Reveal Hybrid Evolution for the Higher – San Francisco Bay Instances appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.

NOTE: KALW reports independently but our station license is held by the SFUSD.

The San Francisco Board of Education is a group of seven elected commissioners who determine policy for public schools from pre-K through twelfth grade. Together, they oversee and direct the school superintendent, Dr. Vincent Matthews. And it’s Dr. Matthews who runs the day to day operations of the district. If you’ve ever seen the Jedi Council in “Star Wars” approving or denying what the Jedis want to do, the school board and the superintendent are kind of like that.

Being a board member is not a full time job. Board members make about six thousand dollars a year and often hold down full time jobs outside of their work on the board. It’s a position with a fair amount of power, but it also comes with a lot of work. And for almost the last year, the school board has been almost consistently in turmoil over delayed reopening and efforts to promote equity in school names and admissions to its most elite high school. In just the last month, the district’s superintendent, Vincent Matthews, announced his plans to retire in June. Two weeks later, the board voted to strip its vice president, Alison Collins, who is African American, of her title and committee assignments. The vote came after an alumni of Lowell High School found and publicized tweets Collins made in 2016 about anti-blackness in the Asian-American community in a way that many people found offensive, especially at a time when violence against Asian-Americans is dominating news headlines.

A closer look at two board meetings over the last year provide a window into some of the turmoil around reopening. These days, the board meets in public on the second and fourth Tuesday of every month. These meetings are not your average one-hour Zoom session. Sometimes they go on for eight hours. Sometimes they include sweet and moving student art performances. At other times they involve hours of finalizing school employee contracts. Despite how dry some moments can be, these meetings can draw a fairly large audience.

At one recent virtual meeting the facilitator ran into a problem: “We only have capabilities of having 500 people on our webinars. We have exceeded that already.”

These meetings are popular because the decisions made here affect families across the city in a tangible way — like how students are admitted to schools and what they are taught there. The board balances a lot of priorities — what voters want, what teachers want, and what the district has the capacity to do — and, this past year in particular, that balancing act has gotten complicated. It was especially clear at one meeting in June of 2020. A meeting that some believe was the moment the reopening plan went off the tracks. Fours hours after they began, the board took up the first item in Section H, Special Orders of Business.

The item began with a presentation from Daniel Menezes, the Chief Human Resources Officer for the school district. He came to the meeting with the superintendent to request that the board approve money to hire a consultant to help the district manage its planning for reopening. The district had a big task on its hands: To reopen quickly and in a way that includes the preferences of teachers and families, while also meeting ever-changing local, state, and national guidelines. To find the right consultant, district staff solicited proposals over the course of a few months. They received seven and selected one based on that group’s experience and commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. But the district can’t hire an outside consultant, or spend over $50,000, without board approval. So that night, Menezes was there along with other district employees to secure it.

“Can we just please please stop connecting ourselves to folks who are part of the privatization world. I am deeply concerned.”

There was a hitch as there often is in these meetings. It’s the moment where the conditions change from smooth sailing to decidedly choppy waters. A moment that often occurs during public comment.

One caller said, “If you look at their partner page, you’ll see that they are deeply connected to charter school organizations.”

The consulting group, which applied under the name The Partnership for Planning Group, included people who also worked for an organization called Promise 54. Promise 54 had previously consulted for charter schools, which sometimes divert money and resources away from traditional public schools. Members of the public took issue with association with charter schools.

Another caller echoed the opinions of others, “Can we just please please stop connecting ourselves to folks who are part of the privatization world. I am deeply concerned.”

Then, Susan Soloman, the president of the teachers union, weighed in: “We weren’t involved in the selection process. Had we been involved, we could have helped to flag this as an issue.”

Superintendent Matthews tried to calm the concerns of the public by saying, “Almost all, for sure, had some connection with both charters and traditional public schools. The second piece, what we’re looking for, was really a project manager. It’s not someone who’s going to come in and try to start a charter school, but really, it’s just a management project.”

But some commissioners, including Alison Collins, had a problem with this. When the conversation turned back to the commissioners, Collins said, “It is concerning to me that we have to hire somebody to do project management. We should be able to do project management. We need to build our own capacity to engage our community and work with families and labor. You know, people are saying invest in black businesses, like, how are we building capacity for homegrown and community based organizations if we continue to spend money on people that are funded by the Walton family foundation?”

The Superintendent replied, “I agree, we want to build ourselves up. But, this is at a time where we knew that we just pretty significantly cut from central. So, this is why we wanted project management assistance on this.”

Here’s where the district was financially at the time this meeting took place: They started the 2019 school year with a $22 million dollar deficit and the onset of the coronavirus almost doubled it. To spare school sites, the board directed most budget cuts to come from the district’s central office. So, employees were let go, and, now, fewer people were available to do district-wide project management.

Commissioner Norton expressed a desire to support the superintendent and what he and his staff said they needed. She said, “I think we’re losing sight of the real important underlying issue here. We need to have the best opening we possibly can. I don’t see why adding on difficulty to the staff makes any of that better for our families and our students. So, you know, I don’t love who they’ve worked with, either. To me, that’s less important than supporting our superintendent and holding him accountable for making sure he gets this process right.”

Commissioner Collins felt differently: “When we’re talking about making this difficult, I’m asking, I want this to be authentic, okay. We’ve got parents that work for free. You’re telling me that some of this money couldn’t pay parents? Honestly, we’re just perpetuating white supremacy and saying, a firm — we’ll pay them a lot of money. And then, the real work is done by people who don’t get paid. I’ve said since the beginning of COVID, we need to do things differently. Now is a good enough time to do it as any, because, you know, we could come up with a plan. And, if it’s not based on actual input that’s authentic and is co-created with community members then I don’t care about a plan. It doesn’t matter.”

“Were we counting on this? There’s no doubt we were. You know, from our perspective, the staff’s perspective, would it be smoother with this organization leading a facilitated effort for us? Yes.”

San Francisco Unified Superintendent Vincent Matthews

Norton responded, “I just want to say I do care about a plan Commissioner Collins. I mean, I heard Daniel say that, in fact, the consultant was putting together a plan that we would do the outreach and we would be engaging with our families. So, you know, I agree with you.”

Then Board President Mark Sanchez asked what other options existed: “Alright. I hear you, Dr. Matthews, that the other organizations have similar relationships with other folks we don’t appreciate. I’m just wondering, what’s plan B?”

The superintendent said, essentially, there wasn’t one: “I wish I could give you that answer. I mean, we’re gonna do everything we can to make that happen. But, were we counting on this? There’s no doubt we were. You know, from our perspective, the staff’s perspective, would it be smoother with this organization leading a facilitated effort for us? Yes.”

In the end, funding for a consultant to help with reopening was denied. Commissioners Lam, López, Collins, and Moliga voted against hiring the contractor while Sanchez and Norton voted for it. One board member, Stevon Cook, was absent.

That meeting was almost ten months ago. Between then and now, there was a board election. More ballots were cast in that school board race than in any in over a decade. In January, the new board met to discuss priorities for the year with the help of a hired facilitator. Newly elected commissioners Kevine Boggess and Matt Alexander were making their first appearance. Three hours in, the board began finalizing its goals for the year. Boggess tried to focus the group on the nuts and bolts of reopening: “I’m going to add this one in as another priority: identifying staffing needs to reopen school safely and support student success.”

But Commissioner Collins and newly-elected Board President López redirected the conversation.

Collins said, “Whenever we talk about reopening schools, I also want to make sure that we’re also talking about supporting students in distance learning. Since the majority of our students are going to be in distance learning, like our high school students, our middle school students, I want to make sure that our resources are allocated equitably. There’s populations that don’t feel safe going to school.”

“If we can move away from reopening schools as a conversation, and more towards re-envisioning what we know to be schools … We cannot go back to what was, because it wasn’t working.”

San Francisco Unified Board President Gabriela López

That didn’t come out of nowhere. In a survey collected by the school district in early January, about 60% of respondents said they were planning to attend in-person learning if it became available. And there were differences across demographics. Eighty percent of white families were planning to attend, compared to about half of families of color. Only about 30% of Asian-American families said they were planning to attend in-person learning.

Commissioner López encouraged the board to think more broadly than reopening: “If I could just say, I actually want us, if we can, to move away from reopening schools as a conversation, and more towards re-envisioning what we know to be schools, because we have identified a number of issues that have lived in our physical school buildings for decades. We cannot go back to what was because it wasn’t working.”

Just a few weeks after that meeting: the board voted 6-1 to rename 44 schools.

The district was criticized and caricatured in the national press. A few weeks after that, they put the effort on hold. They were sued by San Francisco’s mayor and city attorney. And parents began an effort to recall the three board members that were eligible for recall: Commissioners Collins, López, and Moliga. If this board was feeling pressure before, now they had the eyes of the country and world on them. Still, decisions about reopening need to be made.

A staff testing plan needs to be finalized, and school buildings need to be modified. And, as of now, most middle and high school students have no idea when they will return to in-person learning.

In recent weeks, a San Francisco judge denied the city’s request for an order to force public schools reopen. The judge found that the board has a plan for reopening, even if perhaps it’s moving slower than some people might like. And, there’s another, new lawsuit. Commissioner Collins is suing the district and most of her fellow board members saying they violated her free speech rights when they stripped her of her title as vice president and her committee appointments after her 2016 texts were re-publicized.

COVID-19 created an opening for a long overdue reckoning on how our schools serve the city’s communities of color. Now, the San Francisco Unified Board of Education is struggling to address that, while also responding to a global pandemic. What happens next may have long-lasting impacts on our lives and in our communities. Which is probably why we, and the board, are fighting about it so much.

The post What San Francisco Unified Board Conferences Reveal About Faculty Reopening appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.