Yvonne Hinde opens her fridge to reveal three big bottles of water. There are two buckets full in her garden. “We have to be prepared,” she says. She isn’t being dramatic. Like other residents of Everton in Bedfordshire, Hinde, 59, a childminder, can no longer take running water for granted.

Since the start of July the supply has been severely interrupted or cut off five times. Often the taps run dry for hours at a time. The problems have forced the pub to close and the village school to tell children to stay at home. “It makes life really difficult,” says Hinde, who is forced to close her business when the water isn’t running.

Amid extreme heat and a drought warning covering the region, Hinde and Everton’s other residents fear the situation will get worse. The village, in farmland between Bedford and Cambridge and home to about 500 people, is one of the hottest and driest spots in England.

Map of where hosepipe bans are and where they are likely

Even before the record-breaking temperatures it had been struggling with its supply, because of old pipes that often burst and pumping equipment that villagers say cannot cope with demand.

Add to that the fact that the village is slightly uphill from the source at the end of a water line, and the heightened demand in the hot weather, and it’s a “perfect storm,” says Everton parish council chair Andy Simpson, 70, who Regularly fills five five-liter containers with water to keep as a backup supply.

“The extreme heat is a particular concern: the hotter the temperatures, the more people need water, and the more outages there are for us,” he says. “There’s this nagging fear all the time that the water isn’t going to be there.”

Jo Neville, who works as a nurse, is forced to have back-up supplies on hand at all times. Photographer: Fabio De Paola/The Observer

Many villagers have become accustomed to the lack of a reliable supply. Jo Neville, 54, a resident of 16 years, keeps five bottles in the fridge. It’s enough to keep the family – Jo, husband Andy, 56, and their three teenage children – hydrated if the supply stops. “The nearest shop is over two miles away, so it’s not like you can just nip and buy a few bottles,” she says.

While the stockpile tides them over for a few hours, it isn’t enough for the household to function smoothly. Neville is a nurse; her husband is a chimney sweep, so there are showers to be had and uniforms washed. “Everything becomes a lot harder. Everyone is frustrated,” she says.

Last month, after days of low pressure and an on-off supply, things reached boiling point when the problem ruined the biggest event of the Everton calendar: the village hog roast. Anglian Water had sent a tanker to provide an emergency supply. After a few hours it left, with the driver promising a replacement would soon return, villagers claim. But as 100 people gathered at the local hall for the 7.30pm feast, the replacement tanker hadn’t showed up. Soon, the water had run out. With none to flush toilets or wash up, the result was “chaos”. “Tempers were frayed to the extreme,” Simpson says.

More dramatic consequences are not beyond the realms of imagination. Amid extreme heat on 19 July the village green caught fire, sending plumes of smoke over houses and charring the hedgerow. Nearby, an even more serious blaze raged in a farmer’s fields. As firefighters tried to bring them under control, residents were told the domestic supply needed to be shut off to cope with the “unprecedented demand”.

The planet’s most important stories. Get all the week’s environment news – the good, the bad and the essential

Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.Colin Allen struggles when the water supply is cut off. Photographer: Fabio De Paola/The Observer

Anglian Water says it is doing all it can “to reduce the risk of further interruptions for residents”. It said the water network had been severely affected by the hot weather, with demand for public water supply up significantly, meaning pressures were lower in many areas. It added that it was investigating the quality of local pumps and was in the process of replacing pipes.

But residents say the solutions are “sticking plasters” and accuse Anglian of failing to take the problems seriously enough, despite knowing about them for years. They also say they are often left in the dark when they are cut off, with “polite and quick to answer” customer service agents often unable to provide insights into the availability of tankers or updates on when issues will be fixed.

For the local pub, the Thornton Arms, the problems are having a major impact. “It’s been a huge pain in the backside,” said Hannah Cruise, 28, who recently took over the local pub. “We use a lot of water for cooking, washing glasses and toilets, so it has a big impact on business. The uncertainty is the worst thing. If they said they’d cut the water off once every few weeks, you’d be able to cope with it, but there’s no warning.”

Colin Allen, 92, an army veteran and retired teacher, said that the problems were damaging his quality of life. He lives alone and relies on a consistent water supply to be able to cook, clean and offer cups of tea to guests, including a helper who supports him to remain independent. If she comes at a certain time and there’s no water, it throws the day into disarray.

He accused Anglian of “kicking the can down the road” and called for urgent action by the government and Ofwat, the regulator, to ensure a consistent supply. “The system is broken. I don’t think they’re taking that seriously enough.”

The post ‘There’s a nagging concern’: the village that may’t depend on operating water | Water appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.

One week ago, Ryan Bauer was living in a tent on the hard pavement on Gough Street south of Market. Now he’s living on the same pavement with a dramatic upgrade: He’s moved into his own tiny home, with a mattress, desk, chair and — most luxurious of all — a heater that quickly warms his 64-square-foot abode. That’s almost as crucial as a front door that locks from the inside and by a combination lock on the outside.

“It’s definitely a lot warmer, and I don’t have to worry about my stuff being taken,” said Bauer, 45, who is known on the street as “Nobody.” “I haven’t had a locked area where I could leave my stuff and not have it stolen for who knows how long.”

Bauer has been homeless for 30 years, since he left Illinois at age 17. He’s one of 30 men and women to be promoted from a tent city on the city-leased lot into the tiny structures where they can live for at least a year. Eventually the site will hold 70 units in modular duplexes.

The lot at 33 Gough St., between Market and Mission streets, has been used since December 2020 as a city-sanctioned “safe sleeping village,” holding 44 tents for homeless people.

Elizabeth Funk, 52, is founder and executive chairman of DignityMoves, a nonprofit that emerged during the pandemic to address the crisis on the streets. In less than a year, she has raised $2 million to construct a total of 70 rooms in duplexes of prefabricated panels assembled on steel frame foundations with insulation and electrical outlets. The site will have improved bathrooms, storage spaces and a dining area.

The cabins, along with the dining and other facilities, will be paid for by DignityMoves and the nonprofit Tipping Point Community as part of a pilot program. The cost is around $15,000 to build each unit, but adding in amenities like the two dining halls, restrooms, a computer and landscaping, it totals $30,000 per unit. The city will pay for the meal service, security and supportive services.

The city has been spending about $60,000 per tent for safe sleeping villages, including food, security and supportive services.

Known as the DignityMoves Village, the site is San Francisco’s first experiment with tiny homes, an approach to homelessness that’s been used in Oakland, San Jose and other Bay Area cities.

Ryan “Nobody” Bauer has been homeless for 30 years.

Sam Whiting/The Chronicle

The first 12 residents have moved into the rooms decorated by volunteers with homey touches like fleece blankets, artwork, throw pillows, toiletry baskets and welcome notes.

“A lot of the residents have been incarcerated where everything is exactly the same, so they really appreciate the individual touch,” Funk said.

By the time the village is completed this spring, it will have the 70 rooms and two dining halls with three meals a day provided by nonprofit Mother Brown. The nonprofit Urban Alchemy will provide on-site security and supportive services.

The land belongs to a private developer awaiting construction permits for permanent housing. The city’s Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing is leasing it until at least March 2023, with possible extensions.

Shireen McSpadden, director of DHSH, told The Chronicle in September that if the pilot project is a success, the department “might want to replicate it into other parts of the city.”

Everyone who has been living in a tent on the site for a year has been offered a room. Nobody turned it down.

“They said, ‘Are you kidding me?'” said Everett Butler, co-director of Urban Alchemy. “They were beyond appreciative to be able to go inside their own space and lock the door behind them, turn the heaters on and kick back.”

A sister village is being built in Santa Barbara with a separate budget of $1.8 million, and more are being contemplated around the state.

“It’s not a place you would stay forever, but is a stopover while people figure out a way out of homelessness,” said Funk, a Stanford graduate who runs an impact investing fund. Her donor base comes from her own contact list, along with foundations. Dignity Health is a major donor, although the name is coincidental.

“This is not an alternative to permanent housing,” Funk said, “but it is an attractive alternative for people who are willing to go to group shelters.”

Still it will take getting used to. Ryan “Nobody” Bauer has been sleeping upright in a chair for so long, he has been having trouble sleeping while reclining.

“I have to get used to sleeping on a mattress,” he said, “but it’s a lot better than average. I was cold last night and turned on the heater and wow.”

Sam Whiting is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: swhiting@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @samwhitingsf

The post San Francisco’s first tiny dwelling village for homeless individuals opens. At $15,000 a pop, metropolis says it’s cost-effective appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.

Tiny homes are replacing tents at a San Francisco safe sleeping site – for half the cost of the temporary structures.

A village at 33 Gough St., between Market and Mission streets, welcomed its first residents, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. Operated by nonprofit DignityMoves, the village will have 70 units when it’s finished in the spring.

The 60-square-foot cabins consist of prefabricated panels and come with heaters, beds and desks.

“It’s not a place you would stay forever, but is a stopover while people figure out a way out of homelessness,” said Elizabeth Funk, founder and executive chairman of DignityMoves, to the Chronicle.

The homes are being paid for by DignityMoves and the nonprofit Tipping Point Community. Each costs about $30,000 when including on-ground amenities such as the two dining halls, restrooms and computers, compared with $60,000 the city spends on a tent, a cost that encompasses food, security and supportive services.

The city is spending $18.2 million for 260 tents. Funk has raised $2 million for the tiny home units.

The Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing is leasing the land from a private developer awaiting construction permits until at least March 2023.

All those living on one of the tents at the site were offered a room in the village — and all accepted.

“They said, ‘Are you kidding me?'” said Everett Butler, co-director of the nonprofit Urban Alchemy, which will provide on-site security and supportive services. “They were beyond appreciative to be able to go inside their own space and lock the door behind them, turn the heaters on and kick back.”

Last month, a “street ambassador” from Urban Alchemy who was working to counter disruptive behavior at a safe sleeping site, was shot, suffering a minor wound under his left shoulder. A co-worker of the victim said the two male suspects were drug dealers.

[San Francisco Chronicle] — Gabriel Poblete

Contact Gabriel Poblete

The post Folks transfer into tiny properties village in San Francisco for homeless appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.

One week ago, Ryan Bauer was living in a tent on the hard pavement on Gough Street south of Market. Now he’s living on the same pavement with a dramatic upgrade: He’s moved into his own tiny home, with a mattress, desk, chair and most luxurious of all — a heater that quickly warms his 64-square-foot abode. That’s almost as crucial as a front door that locks from the inside and by a combination lock on the outside.

“It’s definitely a lot warmer and I don’t have to worry about my stuff being taken,” said Bauer, 45, who is known on the street as “Nobody.” “I haven’t had a locked area where I could leave my stuff and not have it stolen for who knows how long.”

Bauer has been homeless for 30 years, since he left Illinois at age 17. He’s one of 30 men and women to be promoted from a tent city on the city-leased lot into the tiny cabins where they can live for at least a year. Eventually the site will hold 70 cabins.

The lot at 33 Gough St., between Market and Mission streets, has been used since December 2020 as a city-sanctioned “safe sleeping village,” holding 44 tents for homeless people.

In less than a year, Funk has raised $2 million to construct a total of 70 rooms in modular duplexes of prefabricated panels assembled on steel frame foundations with insulation and electrical outlets. The site will have improved bathrooms, storage spaces and a dining area.

The cabins, along with the dining and other facilities, will be paid for by the nonprofits DignityMoves and Tipping Point Community as part of a pilot program. The cost is around $15,000 to build each home but if you add in amenities like the two dining halls, restrooms, a computer and landscaping, it totals $30,000 per unit. The city will pay for the meal service, security and supportive services.

The city has been spending about $60,000 per tent for safe sleeping villages, about twice the cost of a median one-bedroom in the city.

Known as the DignityMoves Village, the site is San Francisco’s first experiment with tiny homes, an approach to homelessness that’s been used in Oakland, San Jose and other Bay Area cities.

The first 12 residents have moved into the rooms decorated by volunteers with homey touches like fleece blankets, artwork, throw pillows, toiletry baskets and welcome notes by volunteers.

“A lot of the residents have been incarcerated where everything is exactly the same so they really appreciate the individual touch,” said Elizabeth Funk, 52, founder and executive of DignityMoves, a nonprofit which emerged during the pandemic to address the crisis on the streets .

By the time the village is completed this spring, it will have 70 rooms and two dining halls with three meals a day provided by nonprofit Mother Brown. Nonprofit Urban Alchemy will provide on-site security and supportive services.

The land belongs to a private developer awaiting construction permits for permanent housing. The Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing is leasing it until at least March of 2023, with possible extensions.

Shireen McSpadden, director of the city Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, told The Chronicle in September that if the pilot project is a success, the department “might want to replicate it into other parts of the city.”

Everyone who has been living in a tent on the site for a year has been offered a room. Nobody turned it down.

“They said, ‘Are you kidding me?’ said Everett Butler, co-director of Urban Alchemy. “They were beyond appreciative to be able to go inside their own space and lock the door behind them, turn the heaters on and kick back.”

A sister village is being built in Santa Barbara with a separate budget of $1.8 million and more are being contemplated around the state.

“It’s not a place you would stay forever, but is a stopover while people figure out a way out of homelessness,” said Funk, a Stanford graduate who runs an impact investing fund. Her donor base comes from her own contact list along with foundations. Dignity Health is a major donor although the name is coincidental.

“This is not an alternative to permanent housing,” Funk said, “but it is an attractive alternative for people who are willing to go to group shelters.”

Still it will take getting used to. Ryan “Nobody” Bauer has been sleeping upright in a chair for so long, he has been having trouble sleeping while prone.

“I have to get used to sleeping on a mattress,” he said, “but it’s a lot better than average. I was cold last night and turned on the heater and wow.”

Sam Whiting is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: swhiting@sfchronicle.com. Twitter: @samwhitingsf

The post San Francisco’s first tiny cabin village for homeless individuals opens. At $15,000 a pop, metropolis says it’s cost-effective appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.

Officials hope the new community will provide a safer alternative to shelters, but it brings its own challenges.

Allison Artzer has been homeless for over three years, much of it on the streets of San Francisco. Ten months ago, while sitting on a curb with all her belongings, the 36-year-old was approached by a member of the San Francisco homeless outreach team and given them a tent in one of the city’s “safe sleeping villages” at 33 Gough Street offered. on Marktstrasse.

Artzer, who often had their belongings stolen on the streets or thrown away by police officers, said yes.

She found it was a big improvement over the street as it had a central place to store her belongings and a separate room for them. But the tent has some drawbacks. When it rains, her things get wet and some are destroyed no matter how many tarps she throws over them. At night the temperature can drop to almost 45 degrees and she has to snuggle under blankets to fight the cold. She shares a tent with her partner and because the tents are so thin they cannot have private conversations.

So she was excited when she heard that the city would replace her tent with a small hut with a lockable door, bed, desk, and space heater.

“My life has changed for the better in the last 10 months, I only have one place to call home even though it’s a tent,” she says. “Now I want to start looking for a job again and be a normal person again.”

San Francisco officials announced in September that they would build a tiny hometown on Gough Street, which is currently allowing tents to be assembled with on-site security. The 44 tents will be replaced by around 70 tiny homes, each with around 64 square meters, in two parking spaces that the city has rented.

The apartments are part of a pilot project that will run for 18 months. After that, the city’s lease for the Gough Street parking lot will expire. The project is coordinated by the city, but funded by DignityMoves – part of an umbrella organization that pools private capital for social issues – and a non-profit donor called Tipping Point. Urban Alchemy, another non-profit organization, is already providing social services to the tent community and will continue these services for the tiny homes. (Urban Alchemy also provides services to two other safe sleeping villages in San Francisco.)

The project is one of several announced earlier this year when the Mayor of San Francisco London Breed invested more than $ 1 billion in the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing over two years, an investment that includes an RV park .

Elizabeth Funk, CEO of Dignity Capital, which formed the group DignityMoves that will fund the property, says the city has spent relatively little on temporary housing until recently. The tents and Tiny Home model are designed to provide a more hospitable alternative to street homelessness, offering privacy and security not available in dormitories.

“We really believe that the fact that people have their own private space is going to be a game changer,” says Funk.

The sites are also designed to help people transition into a more stable mental state after the trauma of living on the street.

“I can tell you firsthand that everyone experiences trauma while they’re homeless,” said Andrea Urton, CEO of HomeFirst Services in Santa Clara County, who says she used to be homeless.

“You are in an elevated state of panic and crisis,” she says. “Your health deteriorates, your mental problem-solving abilities deteriorate over time.” Urton says that it takes three to six months in stable housing for people to clear their heads.

HomeFirst will be a consultant for the San Francisco Tiny Home Project and will bring their experience building San Jose’s first Tiny Home community. In addition to the lessons learned there, Urton said, it is critical that staff are available to help with a speedy relocation.

While Funk with Dignity Capital isn’t sure how long the stays will be, they’re modeling their approach to Life Moves, which is funded by Project Homekey, a nationwide program designed to convert unused spaces into apartments, a small house community in Mountain View has erected. Average stays on the Mountain View site range from 90 to 100 days. This site also has on-site psychiatric care, nurses, and social workers, which the Gough Street site does not.

The expectation of a quick relocation for the tiny San Francisco community may be related to the desires of their financiers. DignityMoves is a coalition of business owners across the Bay Area who wanted to solve the street homelessness problem. Funk admits that some business owners have “selfish reasons” to want to help, probably out of fear that street homelessness has reduced spending in commercial corridors.

Urton says if the San Francisco location is moving quickly, having staff available to handle housing issues is critical. “If the units aren’t linked to rapid relocation services, it will take a long time to relocate people permanently,” she says.

However, Lena Miller, who runs Urban Alchemy, says that expecting a quick relocation of residents to the Gough Street site may not be realistic because there aren’t enough permanent housing units to move people quickly. She also believes that many residents have basic issues, such as mental health and substance abuse, that need to be addressed.

Artzer says her attempts to find an apartment in the sleeping village on Gough Street have been unsuccessful. She was interviewed twice for accommodation but failed to qualify. She says the apartments offered are primarily for people with mental health problems or physical disabilities that she does not have. “My only problem is that I’m homeless,” she says. In the 10 months she was in the sleeping village, she said that only 6 people she knew were placed in permanent shelter.

Urban Alchemy has two “Care Coordinators” at Gough Street each day who connect residents to outside facilities when they need social workers, plus another 5-6 people who work throughout the day to resolve conflicts and on day-to-day tasks help. Miller says the nonprofit will likely hire another care coordinator once the tiny homes are built, as it will get more funding to deal with adding two dozen people to the population.

Officials in San Francisco claim the tiny home project will have a cheaper cost per person than maintaining 44 tents across the property. Most of the cost of the tent village is security and other staff costs, as the tents themselves cost a little over a hundred dollars each. The city reckons that by increasing the population density with tiny homes that are closer together than the tents, they can lower the cost per person while spending more money.

It is unclear whether this prediction will come true. HomeFirst’s Urton says one of the lessons learned from the San Jose project was that the cost was higher than expected.

“We budgeted a lot less for electricity than planned,” she says. “It’s a lot more expensive than we thought.” She also pointed out the need for licensed therapists, social workers and drug treatments in small shared apartments to help people transition into society.

But Urban Alchemy’s Miller says it’s unlikely either the city or private donors will want to cover those costs at the Gough Street site, even with the city’s $ 1.2 billion homeless budget.

“There’s probably more than can be done,” she says, “you need therapists, drug treatment, it’s extremely urgent.” While most people are homeless due to economic hardship or a lack of housing, the residents of the safe sleeping villages have San Francisco has an above-average number of people with addictions and mental illnesses, according to Miller.

“An extremely high percentage of the villagers have a double diagnosis,” she says. “If you add up the addiction services that people really need to recover and thrive, the price will be astronomical.”

For Artzer, who says that she has neither addiction nor mental illness and describes herself as healthy, a safe tent in the sleeping village is an immeasurable help. She became homeless for the first time three years ago while working as a waitress. When a number of housing situations went wrong, she lost her deposits and could not afford a new apartment. She ended up renting nightly hotels, but the distance from work resulted in her missing her shifts and eventually losing her job. She soon found herself on the streets with no income.

“It was so quick to be a normal person working inside being outside, it was scary,” she says. “You get used to it, I think.”

Roshan Abraham is Next City’s Housing Correspondent and a former Equitable Cities Fellow. He is based in Queens. Follow him on Twitter at @roshantone.

The post San Francisco Upgrades Tent Village to Tiny Dwelling Group appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.

OAKLAND (KPIX) – An innovative housing solution in East Oakland is gaining international attention as the country’s first youth-rented Tiny Home Village to open this year.

Colorful murals greet visitors to the Tiny House Empowerment Village. A warm welcome home for Ashley Jaggers and her dog.

CONTINUE READING: CA Drought: North Bay water flowing, grass greener thanks to recent rains

“It kind of makes you excited to see it when you walk in. It’s like this place is so cool, ”said Jaggers.

ALSO READ: East Bay Woman offers homeless youth a place of healing

Every house is a little shorter than a mobile home. Jaggers was among the first to move in months ago. She was homeless in Oakland for over two years.

“I used to live under the underpass, in a makeshift tent, in a car,” she explained.

The East Oakland village is home to unsecured people ages 18-25. The once vacant property is now a fenced-in community with 25 tiny homes, a communal kitchen, communal area and showers.

Each unit has a fold-away bed that can be folded up into a desk, a laptop, WiFi and electricity.

Village director Angel Griffin says the residents have more than a roof over their heads. The residents living there get a fresh start.

“It just gives them a sense of independence and the guidance to say, ‘Okay, I can do this on my own,'” Griffin said.

Residents must participate in the Youth Spirit Artworks program. The Berkeley-based nonprofit provides professional training, health insurance, full service, and art classes to promote healing.

CONTINUE READING: PG&E expects claims of at least $ 1.15 billion related to Dixie Fire

Residents pay a third of their income for rent and can stay in the tiny homes for two years while they get back on their feet.

Sally Hindman, founder of Youth Spirit Artworks, says the nonprofit’s interns created the vision for the village a few years ago and guided the process from planning to prototype.

“You were the decision maker. They were brilliant leaders in everything, ”beamed Hindman.

Youth leaders received help from 3,000 volunteers from dozens of interfaith communities, schools and businesses. They built and painted the murals.

The $ 1.3 million project is funded by city grants, a GoFundMe campaign, and material donations.

“It’s an amazing model of what a community can do when they decide to tackle a problem,” said Hindman.

And the world is watching.

“We received calls from Germany and e-mails from Romania,” she said.

Here in the Bay Area, talks are ongoing with several cities about building the next 75 tiny homes in the East Bay.

For Jaggers, she finally enjoys a safe, quiet environment to study online at Laney College.

MORE NEWS: COVID: San Francisco Muni will introduce temporary cuts to “short” scheduled services when the vaccination deadline arrives

She plans to become a social worker so she can open doors to others who also need a home – and hope – for their future.

The post East Oakland Tiny Houses Village Garners Worldwide Consideration – CBS San Francisco appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.

Allison Artzer has been homeless for over three years, much of it on the streets of San Francisco. Ten months ago, while sitting on a curb with all her belongings, the 36-year-old was approached by a member of the San Francisco homeless outreach team and offered a tent in one of the city’s “safe sleeping villages” at 33 Gough Street. on Marktstrasse.

Artzer, who often had their belongings stolen on the streets or thrown away by police officers, said yes.

She found it was a big improvement over the street as it had a central location for her belongings and a dedicated room. But the tent has some drawbacks. When it rains, her things get wet and some are destroyed no matter how many tarps she throws over them. At night, the temperature can drop to nearly 45 degrees and she has to snuggle under blankets to fight the cold. She shares a tent with her partner and because the tents are so thin they cannot have private conversations.

So she was excited when she heard that the city would replace her tent with a small hut with a lockable door, bed, desk and space heater.

“My life has changed for the better in the last 10 months, I only have one place to call home even though it’s a tent,” she says. “Now I want to start again, having a job and being a normal person again.”

San Francisco officials announced in September that they would build a tiny hometown on Gough Street, which currently allows for a collection of tents with on-site security. The 44 tents will be replaced by around 70 tiny homes, each with around 64 square meters, in two parking spaces that the city has rented.

The homes are part of an 18-month pilot project that will expire the city’s lease in the Gough Street parking lot. The project is coordinated by the city, but funded by DignityMoves – part of an umbrella organization that pools private capital for social issues – and a non-profit donor called Tipping Point. Urban Alchemy, another non-profit organization, is already providing social services to the tent community and will continue these services for the tiny homes. (Urban Alchemy also provides services to two other safe sleeping villages in San Francisco.)

The project is one of several announced earlier this year when the Mayor of San Francisco London Breed invested more than $ 1 billion in the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing within two years, an investment that includes an RV park .

Elizabeth Funk, CEO of Dignity Capital, which formed the group DignityMoves that will fund the property, says the city has spent relatively little on temporary housing until recently. The tents and tiny home model are designed to provide a more hospitable alternative to street homelessness, offering privacy and security not available in dormitories.

“We really believe that it will be a decisive factor when people have their own private space,” says Funk.

The sites are also designed to help people transition into a more stable mental state after the trauma of living on the street.

“I can tell you firsthand that everyone experiences trauma while homeless,” said Andrea Urton, CEO of HomeFirst Services in Santa Clara County, who says she used to be homeless.

“You are in an increased state of panic and crisis,” she says. “Your health deteriorates, your mental problem-solving abilities deteriorate over time.” Urton says it takes three to six months in stable housing for people to clear their minds.

HomeFirst will be a consultant for the San Francisco Tiny Home Project and will bring their experience building San Jose’s first tiny home community. One of the lessons learned there, said Urton, is that it is of vital importance to have staff available to help with the rapid relocation.

While Funk with Dignity Capital isn’t sure how long the stays will be, they’re modeling their approach to Life Moves, which is a small house community in Mountain View with money from Project Homekey, a statewide program that aims to convert unused space into living space built up. Average stays on the Mountain View website are between 90 and 100 days. This location also has on-site psychiatric care, nurses and social workers, which the Gough Street location does not.

The expectation of a quick relocation for the tiny San Francisco community may be related to the desires of their financiers. DignityMoves is an association of business owners across the Bay Area who wanted to solve the street homelessness problem. Funk admits that some business owners have “selfish reasons” to want to help, probably out of fear that street homelessness has reduced spending in commercial corridors.

Urton says if the San Francisco location is moving quickly, having staff available to handle housing issues is critical. “Unless there are quick relocation services connected to the units, it will take a long time to relocate people permanently,” she says.

However, Lena Miller, who runs Urban Alchemy, says that expecting a quick relocation of residents to the Gough Street site may not be realistic because there aren’t enough permanent housing units to move people quickly. She also believes that many residents have basic issues, such as mental health and substance abuse, that need to be addressed.

Artzer says her attempts to find an apartment in the sleeping village on Gough Street have been unsuccessful. She was interviewed twice for accommodation but failed to qualify. She says the accommodations offered have been preferred for people with mental health problems or physical disabilities that she does not have. “My only problem is that I’m homeless,” she says. In the 10 months she was in the sleeping village, she says that only 6 people she knew were put into permanent shelter.

Urban Alchemy has two “Care Coordinators” at Gough Street each day who connect residents with outside agencies when they need social workers, plus another 5-6 people who work throughout the day to resolve conflicts and on day-to-day tasks help. Miller says the nonprofit will likely hire another care coordinator once the tiny homes are built, as it will get more funding to deal with adding two dozen people to the population.

Officials in San Francisco claim the tiny home project will have a cheaper per person cost than maintaining 44 tents on the property. Most of the cost of the tent village is security and other staff costs, as the tents themselves cost a little over a hundred dollars each. The city reckons that by increasing the population density in the square with tiny homes that are closer together than the tents, the cost per person can be reduced while they are spending more money.

It is unclear whether this prediction will come true. HomeFirst’s Urton says one of the lessons learned from the San Jose project was that the cost was higher than expected.

“We budgeted a lot less for electricity than planned,” she says. “It’s a lot more expensive than we thought.” She also pointed to the need for licensed therapists, social workers and drug treatments in small shared apartments to help people transition into society.

But Urban Alchemy’s Miller says it’s unlikely either the city or private donors will want to cover those costs at the Gough Street site, even with the city’s $ 1.2 billion homeless budget.

“There’s probably more than can be done,” she says, “you need therapists, drug treatment, that’s an extremely high need.” While most people are homeless due to economic hardship or lack of housing, the residents have the safer According to Miller, San Francisco sleep villages have an above-average number of people with addictions and mental illnesses.

“An extremely high percentage of the people who live in the village have a double diagnosis,” she says. “If you add up the addiction services that people really need to recover and thrive, the price will be astronomical.”

For Artzer, who says she has no addiction or mental illness and describes herself as healthy, a safe tent in the sleeping village is an immeasurable help. She became homeless for the first time three years ago while working as a waitress. When a number of housing situations went wrong, she lost her deposits and could not afford a new apartment. She ended up renting hotels nightly, but the distance from work resulted in her missing shifts and eventually losing her job. She soon found herself on the streets with no income.

“It was just so quick to work inside as a normal person, to be outside, it was scary,” she says. “You get used to it, I think.”

Roshan Abraham is Next City’s Housing Correspondent and a former Equitable Cities Fellow. He is based in Queens. Follow him on Twitter at @roshantone.

The post San Francisco Upgrades Tent Village to Tiny House Group appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.

When I heard that the waters of the bay could be camped 20 miles north of San Francisco on the site of a historic Chinese shrimp bay dating from the 1880s, I didn’t expect the original village to still be standing.

But there it sits somehow, on a hidden beach under the low Marin hills, little sun-bleached huts on the sand and a rickety pier that stretches across the brackish water, almost ghostly through the fog, as if time has been lost.

—

I arrived at China Camp State Park with my family late on a Friday afternoon to explore the fabled fishing village, so we postponed this adventure until the morning. Instead, we took a short family-friendly twilight hike around a curious cliff called Turtle Back Hill. (The entire state park has more than 15 trails of varying degrees of difficulty.)

Turtle Back Hill is an ecologically unique peninsula – it is almost an island, apart from a dune island that borders Marin. It rises from the reed swamp like, well, a turtle shell. The easy three-quarters of a mile heart-shaped trail winds through open grasslands and a shady oak forest.

The farthest point of the trail overlooks Jakes Island, about 60 meters offshore, over a muddy plain. This little island is inaccessible to hikers, but not deer, and we were lucky enough to see three peek out from the oak trees, jump over the reeds, and make their journey through the swamp.

China Camp State Park campsite.

Andrew Chamings / SFGATE

After watching the deer, we headed back to the campsite, pitched our tent, made a fire, charred marshmallows, and stared at the sky. Despite being only half a mile from San Rafael, the place feels wonderfully solitary thanks to the hills and canyons that separate it from the rest of Marin County.

It was a beautifully peaceful California night and we slept well (I didn’t tell my daughters about the gruesome barbecue murders that happened in this exact place 46 years ago).

In the morning we excitedly made our way one kilometer around the coast to the historic fishing village without really knowing what to expect.

The old settlement is both desolate and magical and at first glance looks like a ghost town that has remained on the sandy beach of San Pablo Bay for a century and a half. An old, battered log cabin with faded signs for Tacoma beer and fresh crabs looks out over the narrow pier. But we were surprised that it was still doing business, and even though crabs were no longer on sale, we bought some sodas from a kind man named Ernie Stanton, and I gave my kids a few dollars to put in the Friends donation jar of China Camp to throw.

China Camp Village, Marin, California.

Andrew Chamings / SFGATE

Stanton’s story intersects with a man who formed the final link in part of Bay Area history, Frank Quan.

“I grew up in San Francisco and was a beachgoer here, but I would help Frank with the store,” Stanton tells me, and he’s been running the cabin with friends since Quan died in 2016.

Frank Quan spent his last years in the hut right on the beach and was the last Sino-American shrimp fisherman to practice his craft at China Camp, where he went to the pier to his fishing boat almost every day for over 80 years.

China Camp State Park.

Andrew Chamings / SFGATE

Frank’s parents met in the camp, he was born there, and his grandfather was one of the first Chinese immigrants to haul in shrimp nets from this very spot in the 1880s.

The bay was once the ancestral home of the indigenous coastal Miwok. The Miwoks took only what they needed from land and sea, hunted deer and rabbits in the hills, fished in the bay and harvested acorns from the surrounding oak groves.

As with so many indigenous settlements, the population was almost wiped out by the arrival of the Spaniards in the late 18th century.

China Camp Village, Marin, California.

Andrew Chamings / SFGATE

After the completion of the Transcontinental Railroad in the 1860s, Chinese workers, many of whom had immigrated from the maritime province of Kwangtung or what is now Guangdong, found themselves looking for work. The fertile Wadden Sea on the coast of Marin Bay was perfect for grass shrimp and after leasing the bay, 500 fishermen settled there to catch shrimp from the rich Wadden Sea. In its prime, the small village had 28 buildings, including three general stores, a fishing tackle, boat rentals, and a barber shop.

The villagers sailed from the pier in junks (long wooden boats) and fetched the shrimp in hand-sewn nets. The bamboo buckets of crustaceans were boiled and then dried in the California sun on a nearby hill before being sent across the ocean to market. In the early 1880s, nearly 3 million pounds of shrimp were caught at China Camp and exported to Hawaii and China each year.

Archive photo of villager processing shrimp for shipment to China Camp Village, date unknown.

Archive / Unknown

At the time, there were around 30 similar Chinese shrimp villages around the bay, from Hunters Point to the Sacramento River Delta.

As vicious anti-Chinese resentment grew in San Francisco, the villages became isolated, maintaining their culture, language and traditions, although villagers used the in winter when the shrimp were bad and the fog was too dense to dry their shells Take a boat there Visit San Francisco’s growing Chinatown.

China Camp Village, Marin, California.

Andrew Chamings / SFGATE

The booming success of the fishing company was short-lived, however, as anti-Chinese violence and racism spread, culminating in the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which prevented new Chinese workers from migrating to the U.S. The wide nets of the community in the China Camp were even banned . Nevertheless, the remaining families continued to fish into the early 20th century. One of these first fishermen, Quan Hock Quock, Frank Quan’s grandfather, moved from San Francisco to the bay to run the oceanfront store that still exists today.

The bay’s largest population came unexpectedly in 1906 when the village sheltered about 10,000 Chinese Americans who were evicted from San Francisco after being devastated by earthquakes and fires.

However, by World War II, industry had dwindled, and all 30 Chinese fishing villages in the Bay Area had disappeared, except for this small bay outside of San Rafael. The Quans were the only family that still pulled shrimp from the swamp.

China Camp Village, Marin, California.

Andrew Chamings / SFGATE

Thanks to the fact that the area was granted state park status in the 1970s, the town remained as it is, and Quan was allowed to live in the small hut by the water until his later life, where he continued to fish and the Shrimp sold as bait. The site was listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Fewer locations in California can demonstrate the value of historical protection afforded.

Quan never married, and his centuries-old ancestry at China Camp attracted like empty nets at low tide.

When asked in 2014 if he was sad that after his death there will be no more Chinese fishermen to continue the legacy, Quan smiled. “No, I don’t think about it,” he said. “None of us are immortal.”

It’s hard to believe that this little piece of well-preserved history is so close and yet so hidden from San Francisco. China Camp, often shrouded in mist rolling down from the low hills, can feel lonely, a corner of the bay that stands on the water almost exactly as it was 140 years ago.

The post The Chinese language fishing village misplaced to time, simply north of San Francisco appeared first on Los Gatos News And Events.